IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Sunagel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 19 4 1 5 0.263 0.0335 0.0335 0.0833 0.0833
2021-22 Great Falls Americans NA3HL 46 14 26 40 0.870 0.1108 0.1128 0.2751 0.2800
2022-23 — NA3HL 40 13 24 37 0.925 0.1178 0.1146 0.2926 0.2845
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 19 2 3 5 0.263
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 19 2 3 5 0.263
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 19 2 3 5 0.263
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 19 2 3 5 0.263
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 19 2 3 5 0.263
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 19 2 3 5 0.263

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32498
Forward overall
#1942
Forward born in 2003
#1272
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Curtis
Castleton · 2004-05
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Veneklase
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Lane
Aurora · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.