IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel Feamster Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Pueblo Bulls USPHL-Premier 41 8 10 18 0.439 0.0574 0.0574 0.1490 0.1490
2021-22 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 38 40 33 73 1.921 0.2411 0.2216 0.6065 0.5574
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 10 12 0.444
2024-25 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 10 12 0.444
2023-24 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 10 12 0.444
2022-23 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 10 12 0.444
2021-22 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 10 12 0.444
2020-21 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 10 12 0.444

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14404
Forward overall
#671
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Fauchoux
Concordia · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Fea
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Newpower
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2022-23
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.