IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Massie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Anaheim Avalanche USPHL-Premier 32 5 12 17 0.531 0.0695 0.0695 0.1803 0.1803
2021-22 Bozeman Ice Dogs NA3HL 46 19 31 50 1.087 0.1364 0.1260 0.3432 0.3170
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 37 2 6 8 0.216
2024-25 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 37 2 6 8 0.216
2023-24 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 37 2 6 8 0.216
2022-23 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 37 2 6 8 0.216
2021-22 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 37 2 6 8 0.216
2020-21 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 37 2 6 8 0.216

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25600
Forward overall
#1297
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zachary Feldman
Lake Forest · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Harren
Saint John's · 2008-09
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Singerhouse
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.