← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gion Coray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-12 Country: Switzerland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 37 16 32 48 1.297 0.1628 0.1646 0.4096 0.4142
2022-23 Provo Predators USPHL-Premier 49 13 23 36 0.735 0.0961 0.0930 0.2494 0.2413
2023-24 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 38 20 25 45 1.184 0.1549 0.1424 0.4019 0.3695
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 24 11 26 37 1.542
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 24 11 26 37 1.542
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 24 11 26 37 1.542
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 24 11 26 37 1.542
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 24 11 26 37 1.542
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 24 11 26 37 1.542

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14162
Forward overall
#681
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2016-17
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.