← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Lukasezck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Farmington USHS-MN 17 6 4 10 0.588 0.0745 0.0745 0.1429 0.1429
2021-22 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 33 1 11 12 0.364 0.0456 0.0448 0.1148 0.1127
2022-23 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 43 2 14 16 0.372 0.0467 0.0437 0.1175 0.1101
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Mary ACHA_D1 32 1 5 6 0.188
2024-25 University of Mary ACHA_D1 32 1 5 6 0.188
2023-24 University of Mary ACHA_D1 32 1 5 6 0.188
2022-23 University of Mary ACHA_D1 32 1 5 6 0.188
2021-22 University of Mary ACHA_D1 32 1 5 6 0.188
2020-21 University of Mary ACHA_D1 32 1 5 6 0.188

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16847
Defenseman overall
#2966
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.