← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Heuerman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 14 2 3 5 0.357 0.0448 0.0457 0.1127 0.1149
2022-23 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 45 16 8 24 0.533 0.0669 0.0652 0.1684 0.1641
2023-24 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Premier 44 17 10 27 0.614 0.0803 0.0745 0.2083 0.1932
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 25 2 3 5 0.200
2024-25 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 25 2 3 5 0.200
2023-24 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 25 2 3 5 0.200
2022-23 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 25 2 3 5 0.200
2021-22 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 25 2 3 5 0.200
2020-21 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 25 2 3 5 0.200

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36898
Forward overall
#2282
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2016-17
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2015-16
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.