IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dario Sacino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NA3HL 6 0 3 3 0.500 0.0628 0.0647 0.1578 0.1626
2023-24 Espanola Paper Kings NOJHL 21 11 12 23 1.095 0.1829 0.1766 0.4559 0.4403
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 27 3 6 9 0.333
2024-25 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 27 3 6 9 0.333
2023-24 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 27 3 6 9 0.333
2022-23 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 27 3 6 9 0.333
2021-22 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 27 3 6 9 0.333
2020-21 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 27 3 6 9 0.333

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25634
Forward overall
#1447
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan McCormack
Canton · 2017-18
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Schneider
Lawrence · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Karim Gayfullin
Curry · 2022-23
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.