IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Elliot Testa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Sartell USHS-MN 27 15 23 38 1.407 0.1782 0.1782 0.3419 0.3419
2023-24 Gillette Wild NA3HL 42 12 33 45 1.071 0.1345 0.1377 0.3382 0.3462
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 29 5 13 18 0.621
2024-25 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 29 5 13 18 0.621
2023-24 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 29 5 13 18 0.621
2022-23 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 29 5 13 18 0.621
2021-22 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 29 5 13 18 0.621
2020-21 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 29 5 13 18 0.621

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15992
Forward overall
#830
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

J.T. Entelisano
Utica · 2016-17
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Trapp
Hamline · 2014-15
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Schrank
Elmira · 2004-05
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.