| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 53 | 6 | 18 | 24 | 0.453 | 0.2883 | 0.2872 | 1.3569 | 1.3515 |
| 2001-02 | — | USHL | 40 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 0.225 | 0.1433 | 0.1356 | 0.6743 | 0.6381 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | St. John's | D3 | — | SR | 25 | 1 | 13 | 14 | 0.560 |
| 2004-05 | St. John's | D3 | — | JR | 28 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 1.071 |
| 2003-04 | St. John's | D3 | — | SO | 26 | 15 | 24 | 39 | 1.500 |
| 2002-03 | St. John's | D3 | — | FR | 28 | 15 | 24 | 39 | 1.393 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.