← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Summers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Northeast Generals NA3HL 43 10 21 31 0.721 0.0905 0.0952 0.2276 0.2395
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 17 3 3 6 0.353
2024-25 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 17 3 3 6 0.353
2023-24 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 17 3 3 6 0.353
2022-23 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 17 3 3 6 0.353
2021-22 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 17 3 3 6 0.353
2020-21 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 17 3 3 6 0.353

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34090
Forward overall
#2052
Forward born in 2005
#1430
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2015-16
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2017-18
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.