IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Jost Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-16 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 46 7 6 13 0.283 0.0355 0.0382 0.0892 0.0960
2024-25 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Premier 32 2 3 5 0.156 0.0204 0.0208 0.0530 0.0540
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
70%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#56201
Forward overall
#3831
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Turner
Manhattanville · 2021-22
0.158 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Lawler
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tarek Paranica
Curry · 2015-16
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.