← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tarek Paranica Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 MJHL 41 3 7 10 0.244 0.0470 0.0479 0.1538 0.1569
2016-17 Neepawa Titans MJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE GR 22 8 8 16 0.727
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE SR 18 6 11 17 0.944
2020-21 Curry D1 CNE JR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE JR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2019-20 Curry D1 CNE SO 18 1 2 3 0.167
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE SO 18 1 2 3 0.167
2018-19 Curry D1 CNE FR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2018-19 Curry D3 CNE FR 23 1 4 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2018-19 · Curry
+430.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#54226
Forward overall
#2839
Forward born in 1997
#1787
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.