IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Ricci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 38 0 8 8 0.210 0.0358 0.0377 0.0892 0.0940
2022-23 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 51 6 14 20 0.392 0.0668 0.0675 0.1662 0.1680
2023-24 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 48 6 15 21 0.438 0.0745 0.0714 0.1854 0.1777
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 19 0 3 3 0.158
2024-25 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19126
Defenseman overall
#3405
Defenseman born in 2004
#1162
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Allen
UMass Dartmouth · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Klein
Wisconsin-Superior · 2008-09
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Frank Sullivan
Salve Regina · 2015-16
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.