IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Ricci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 38 0 8 8 0.210 0.0535 0.0564 0.0873 0.0920
2022-23 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 51 6 14 20 0.392 0.0997 0.1008 0.1627 0.1645
2023-24 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 48 6 15 21 0.438 0.1113 0.1067 0.1815 0.1740
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 19 0 3 3 0.158
2024-25 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17925
Defenseman overall
#3270
Defenseman born in 2004
#1196
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vinny Muchalla
Wentworth · 2007-08
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Parent
Western New England · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
David Higgs
Finlandia · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.