← New Search ↗ Social Card

Preston Castaneda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-07-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 USPHL-Premier 29 0 3 3 0.103 0.0135 0.0141 0.0351 0.0366
2023-24 Bozeman Ice Dogs NA3HL 36 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Henderson Force USPHL-Premier 46 3 11 14 0.304 0.0398 0.0373 0.1033 0.0968
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 32 0 8 8 0.250
2024-25 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 32 0 8 8 0.250
2023-24 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 32 0 8 8 0.250
2022-23 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 32 0 8 8 0.250
2021-22 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 32 0 8 8 0.250
2020-21 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 32 0 8 8 0.250

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25485
Defenseman overall
#4066
Defenseman born in 2004
#6547
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2022-23
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.