IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Wilkerson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-12-16 Country: USA
Manhattanville
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 46 16 12 28 0.609 0.0775 0.0784 0.1925 0.1948
2025-26 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 45 9 21 30 0.667 0.0849 0.0816 0.2109 0.2027
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10929
Defenseman overall
#2279
Defenseman born in 2005
#1699
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

Manhattanville Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brian Essing
0.25
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville
Corey Popowcer
0.24
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville
Nathan Pelligra
0.29
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville
Tanner Hicks
0.26
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Bailey
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Kippenhan
Becker · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew White
Franklin Pierce · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.