IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Baylor Stebbins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-21 Country: USA
Augsburg
MIAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Sartell USHS-MN 25 10 9 19 0.760 0.0962 0.0962 0.1846 0.1846
2022-23 Sartell USHS-MN 27 20 22 42 1.556 0.1969 0.1969 0.3779 0.3779
2023-24 Sartell USHS-MN 26 16 11 27 1.038 0.1315 0.1315 0.2523 0.2523
2024-25 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 36 4 4 8 0.222 0.0279 0.0279 0.0701 0.0701
2025-26 — NA3HL 47 25 21 46 0.979 0.1228 0.1166 0.3090 0.2933
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31266
Forward overall
#1861
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Augsburg Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Mack Ohnsted
0.40
actual FR PPG at Augsburg
Jim Jensen
0.96
actual FR PPG at Augsburg
Mario Mjelleli
0.60
actual FR PPG at Augsburg
Ben Bradbury
0.42
actual FR PPG at Augsburg

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Tenezaca
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bittner
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Deschamps
Rivier · 2024-25
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.