← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hank Garrett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-08 Country: USA
Western New England
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 East Ridge USHS-MN 23 0 1 1 0.043 0.0055 0.0055 0.0106 0.0106
2024-25 Wausau Cyclones NA3HL 30 1 1 2 0.067 0.0084 0.0085 0.0211 0.0213
2025-26 Texas Roadrunners NA3HL 46 22 22 44 0.957 0.1200 0.1152 0.3020 0.2899
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45290
Forward overall
#2999
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

Western New England Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.88
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.30
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western New England

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2023-24
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.