IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Luukko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-12-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 48 0 17 17 0.354 0.0994 0.1030 0.2912 0.3018
2015-16 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 38 4 9 13 0.342 0.0960 0.0948 0.2813 0.2777
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 31 2 6 8 0.258
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 34 0 4 4 0.118
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 5 0 1 1 0.200
2016-17 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#17527
Defenseman overall
#2057
Defenseman born in 1995
#225
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braydon Barker
Concordia · 2016-17
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Ammar
Chatham · 2022-23
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Darby McCarthy
Southern New Hampshire · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.