← New Search ↗ Social Card

Melker Sigurd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-04-27 Country: Sweden
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Holy Cross
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 MoDo Hockey U20 SHL-J20 14 0 1 1 0.071 0.0397 0.0434 0.0951 0.1041
2023-24 MoDo Hockey U20 SuperElit 42 0 12 12 0.286 0.1127 0.1178 0.3880 0.4056
2024-25 MoDo Hockey U20 SuperElit 32 3 10 13 0.406 0.1603 0.1595 0.5517 0.5490
2025-26 Rögle BK U20 SHL-J20 36 4 20 24 0.667 0.3706 0.3540 0.8883 0.8485
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3181
Defenseman overall
#632
Defenseman born in 2006
#830
in SHL-J20

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Holy Cross Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2021-22
0.11
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2015-16
0.05
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
BCHL 2024-25
0.21
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
BCHL 2022-23
0.05
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2002-03
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2004-05
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.