← New Search ↗ Social Card

Melker Sigurd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-04-27 Country: Sweden
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Holy Cross
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 MoDo Hockey U20 SHL-J20 14 0 1 1 0.071 0.0396 0.0433 0.0950 0.1039
2023-24 MoDo Hockey U20 SuperElit 42 0 12 12 0.286 0.1127 0.1178 0.3936 0.4115
2024-25 MoDo Hockey U20 SuperElit 32 3 10 13 0.406 0.1603 0.1595 0.5596 0.5568
2025-26 Rögle BK U20 SHL-J20 36 4 20 24 0.667 0.3702 0.3536 0.8875 0.8477
2026-27 Fargo Force USHL 6 2 2 4 0.667 0.3933 0.3933 2.0006 2.0006
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3238
Defenseman overall
#651
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Holy Cross Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USports-M 2024-25
0.26
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
BCHL 2024-25
0.21
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
NAHL 2021-22
0.11
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2015-16
0.05
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.