← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Glass Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-12-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Elite 14 6 2 8 0.571 0.0527 0.0532 0.1309 0.1322
2018-19 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 38 3 3 6 0.158 0.0207 0.0209 0.0536 0.0540
2019-20 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 37 6 11 17 0.460 0.0601 0.0601 0.1560 0.1560
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 29 6 8 14 0.483
2024-25 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 29 6 8 14 0.483
2023-24 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 29 6 8 14 0.483
2022-23 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 29 6 8 14 0.483
2021-22 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 29 6 8 14 0.483
2020-21 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 29 6 8 14 0.483
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2020-21 · University of Oklahoma
+1570.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
70%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45118
Forward overall
#2594
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2016-17
0.120 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2022-23
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.