IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christopher Hamilton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 40 5 10 15 0.375 0.0415 0.0419 0.1188 0.1200
2023-24 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 41 8 20 28 0.683 0.0755 0.0726 0.2163 0.2081
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Connecticut D3 LittleEast — 7 1 0 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2025-26 · Western Connecticut
+151.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13093
Defenseman overall
#2581
Defenseman born in 2003
#2151
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Phee
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Hefty
Concordia (WI) · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Houlihan
Nazareth · 2018-19
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.