← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Vesbland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Elite 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0308 0.0334 0.0763 0.0828
2020-21 Elmira Impact USPHL-Premier 41 4 10 14 0.342 0.0447 0.0447 0.1159 0.1159
2021-22 EHL 40 2 9 11 0.275 0.0635 0.0644 0.1346 0.1366
2022-23 EHL 45 0 16 16 0.356 0.0821 0.0790 0.1740 0.1675
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Buffalo ACHA_D1 6 0 1 1 0.167
2024-25 Buffalo ACHA_D1 6 0 1 1 0.167
2023-24 Buffalo ACHA_D1 6 0 1 1 0.167
2022-23 Buffalo ACHA_D1 6 0 1 1 0.167
2021-22 Buffalo ACHA_D1 6 0 1 1 0.167
2020-21 Buffalo ACHA_D1 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2020-21 · Buffalo
+429.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15244
Defenseman overall
#2799
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.