← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Bradburn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Elliot Lake Vikings NOJHL 20 2 5 7 0.350 0.0585 0.0585 0.1457 0.1457
2020-21 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 23 5 7 12 0.522 0.0682 0.0682 0.1771 0.1771
2021-22 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 43 10 9 19 0.442 0.0578 0.0545 0.1500 0.1414
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Davenport University ACHA_D1 38 9 6 15 0.395
2024-25 Davenport University ACHA_D1 38 9 6 15 0.395
2023-24 Davenport University ACHA_D1 38 9 6 15 0.395
2022-23 Davenport University ACHA_D1 38 9 6 15 0.395
2021-22 Davenport University ACHA_D1 38 9 6 15 0.395
2020-21 Davenport University ACHA_D1 38 9 6 15 0.395
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2020-21 · Davenport University
+687.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38747
Forward overall
#2131
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2010-11
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2015-16
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2024-25
0.192 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.