IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hudson Blue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 44 2 3 5 0.114 0.0438 0.0474 0.1655 0.1793
2022-23 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 54 9 13 22 0.407 0.1447 0.1458 0.4277 0.4311
2024-25 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 56 17 24 41 0.732 0.2600 0.2484 0.7686 0.7343
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Endicott D3 CNE — 26 1 4 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2025-26 · Endicott
+8.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30779
Forward overall
#1824
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braedyn Aubin
Norwich · 2018-19
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Omar Mullan
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Simopoulos
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.