IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Kramer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-08-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Lincoln Stars USHL 56 10 8 18 0.321 0.1896 0.2043 0.9653 1.0403
2005-06 Lincoln Stars USHL 57 15 23 38 0.667 0.3933 0.4033 2.0024 2.0531
2006-07 Lincoln Stars USHL 55 15 23 38 0.691 0.4076 0.3970 2.0750 2.0209
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 31 13 18 31 1.000
2009-10 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 29 11 15 26 0.897
2008-09 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 33 3 9 12 0.364
2007-08 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 33 8 8 16 0.485
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2007-08 · Princeton
+41.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10991
Forward overall
#377
Forward born in 1987
#983
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Logan Nelson
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sam Rothstein
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Riley Bourbonnais
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.