IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johnny Hurd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Palm Beach Hawks USPHL-Elite 41 14 17 31 0.756 0.0907 0.0969 0.1736 0.1855
2019-20 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Elite 40 20 24 44 1.100 0.1319 0.1319 0.2526 0.2526
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 29 2 9 11 0.379 0.0511 0.0511 0.1291 0.1291
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 41 9 11 20 0.488 0.0657 0.0604 0.1660 0.1527
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Tufts D3 — SR 25 11 7 18 0.720
2003-04 Tufts D3 — JR 24 11 10 21 0.875
2002-03 Tufts D3 — SO 22 12 8 20 0.909
2001-02 Tufts D3 — FR 23 15 10 25 1.087

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44439
Forward overall
#2088
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeff Fedyk
Wentworth · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Auger
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Kramer
Buffalo State · 2011-12
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.