← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Leblanc Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Buffalo Thunder USPHL-Premier 9 4 1 5 0.556 0.1831 0.1831 0.1890 0.1890
2021-22 Elliot Lake Vikings NOJHL 25 5 8 13 0.520 0.1322 0.1338 0.2157 0.2184
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius ACHA_D1 7 2 1 3 0.429
2024-25 Canisius ACHA_D1 7 2 1 3 0.429
2023-24 Canisius ACHA_D1 7 2 1 3 0.429
2022-23 Canisius ACHA_D1 7 2 1 3 0.429
2021-22 Canisius ACHA_D1 7 2 1 3 0.429
2020-21 Canisius ACHA_D1 7 2 1 3 0.429

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40022
Forward overall
#2511
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2005-06
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2015-16
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.