← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Noel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 15 3 11 14 0.933 0.0861 0.0861 0.2137 0.2137
2021-22 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier 42 3 21 24 0.571 0.0747 0.0769 0.1939 0.1995
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 28 10 14 24 0.857
2024-25 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 28 10 14 24 0.857
2023-24 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 28 10 14 24 0.857
2022-23 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 28 10 14 24 0.857
2021-22 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 28 10 14 24 0.857
2020-21 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 28 10 14 24 0.857

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31867
Forward overall
#1902
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.