IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Reichel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Skipjacks Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 9 1 0 1 0.111 0.0145 0.0145 0.0377 0.0377
2021-22 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 12 1 5 6 0.500 0.1155 0.1129 0.2447 0.2392
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Buffalo ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Buffalo ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Buffalo ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Buffalo ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Buffalo ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Buffalo ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41762
Forward overall
#2341
Forward born in 2001
#3938
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alec Lovisek
Adrian · 2021-22
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Spotts
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ari Lifschutz
Lake Forest · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.