IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Wicks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Premier 38 10 8 18 0.474 0.1561 0.1587 0.1612 0.1639
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 27 13 9 22 0.815
2024-25 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 27 13 9 22 0.815
2023-24 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 27 13 9 22 0.815
2022-23 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 27 13 9 22 0.815
2021-22 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 27 13 9 22 0.815
2020-21 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 27 13 9 22 0.815

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35550
Forward overall
#2185
Forward born in 2003
#3061
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Magill-Diaz
Trine · 2015-16
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mathieu Fehr
Nazareth · 2022-23
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Sheehan
King's · 2018-19
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.