IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Wicks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Premier 38 10 8 18 0.474 0.0620 0.0630 0.1608 0.1635
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius ACHA_D1 AHA — 27 13 9 22 0.815
2024-25 Canisius ACHA_D1 AHA — 27 13 9 22 0.815
2023-24 Canisius ACHA_D1 AHA — 27 13 9 22 0.815
2022-23 Canisius ACHA_D1 AHA — 27 13 9 22 0.815
2021-22 Canisius ACHA_D1 AHA — 27 13 9 22 0.815
2020-21 Canisius ACHA_D1 AHA — 27 13 9 22 0.815

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
60%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35742
Forward overall
#2198
Forward born in 2003
#3067
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Magill-Diaz
Trine · 2015-16
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mathieu Fehr
Nazareth · 2022-23
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Darby McCarthy
Southern New Hampshire · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.