← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Coogan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Buffalo Stampede USPHL-Premier 32 6 5 11 0.344 0.1133 0.1232 0.1170 0.1272
2022-23 Buffalo Stampede USPHL-Premier 43 8 15 23 0.535 0.1763 0.1830 0.1820 0.1889
2023-24 USPHL-Premier 27 5 7 12 0.444 0.1465 0.1450 0.1512 0.1496
2024-25 Cincinnati Jr. Cyclones USPHL-Premier 44 21 25 46 1.046 0.3446 0.3209 0.3557 0.3312
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius ACHA_D1 27 3 12 15 0.556
2024-25 Canisius ACHA_D1 27 3 12 15 0.556
2023-24 Canisius ACHA_D1 27 3 12 15 0.556
2022-23 Canisius ACHA_D1 27 3 12 15 0.556
2021-22 Canisius ACHA_D1 27 3 12 15 0.556
2020-21 Canisius ACHA_D1 27 3 12 15 0.556

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22016
Forward overall
#1198
Forward born in 2004
#1545
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2004-05
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.