← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Coogan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Buffalo Stampede USPHL-Premier 32 6 5 11 0.344 0.0450 0.0489 0.1167 0.1269
2022-23 Buffalo Stampede USPHL-Premier 43 8 15 23 0.535 0.0700 0.0727 0.1815 0.1884
2023-24 USPHL-Premier 27 5 7 12 0.444 0.0581 0.0575 0.1508 0.1492
2024-25 Cincinnati Jr. Cyclones USPHL-Premier 44 21 25 46 1.046 0.1368 0.1274 0.3548 0.3304
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius ACHA_D1 AHA 27 3 12 15 0.556
2024-25 Canisius ACHA_D1 AHA 27 3 12 15 0.556
2023-24 Canisius ACHA_D1 AHA 27 3 12 15 0.556
2022-23 Canisius ACHA_D1 AHA 27 3 12 15 0.556
2021-22 Canisius ACHA_D1 AHA 27 3 12 15 0.556
2020-21 Canisius ACHA_D1 AHA 27 3 12 15 0.556

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22305
Forward overall
#1222
Forward born in 2004
#1547
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2011-12
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.