← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Toomey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Elite 29 5 24 29 1.000 0.0923 0.0923 0.2290 0.2290
2021-22 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Elite 40 15 33 48 1.200 0.1108 0.1148 0.2748 0.2847
2022-23 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 41 1 18 19 0.463 0.0606 0.0625 0.1573 0.1622
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 27 9 8 17 0.630
2024-25 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 27 9 8 17 0.630
2023-24 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 27 9 8 17 0.630
2022-23 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 27 9 8 17 0.630
2021-22 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 27 9 8 17 0.630
2020-21 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 27 9 8 17 0.630

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8441
Defenseman overall
#1933
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2021-22
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.