IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Collins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-09-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Greater Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 18 0 6 6 0.333 0.0848 0.0830 0.1383 0.1354
2022-23 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 42 2 10 12 0.286 0.0942 0.0895 0.0972 0.0923
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 25 2 3 5 0.200
2024-25 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 25 2 3 5 0.200
2023-24 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 25 2 3 5 0.200
2022-23 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 25 2 3 5 0.200
2021-22 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 25 2 3 5 0.200
2020-21 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 25 2 3 5 0.200

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22445
Defenseman overall
#3518
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Coady
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Toycen
Lawrence · 2016-17
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jerry Duckett
Framingham State · 2021-22
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.