← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Connelly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 USPHL-Premier 25 4 10 14 0.560 0.0732 0.0729 0.1901 0.1894
2023-24 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 48 4 10 14 0.292 0.1189 0.1135 0.2345 0.2238
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8103
Defenseman overall
#1857
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trine · 2018-19
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2007-08
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.