← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Rayher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 40 3 7 10 0.250 0.0327 0.0334 0.0848 0.0865
2023-24 New Jersey Bears EHL 43 7 13 20 0.465 0.1074 0.1072 0.2276 0.2273
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New York University ACHA_D1 25 5 15 20 0.800
2024-25 New York University ACHA_D1 25 5 15 20 0.800
2023-24 New York University ACHA_D1 25 5 15 20 0.800
2022-23 New York University ACHA_D1 25 5 15 20 0.800
2021-22 New York University ACHA_D1 25 5 15 20 0.800
2020-21 New York University ACHA_D1 25 5 15 20 0.800

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40764
Forward overall
#2641
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2023-24
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2022-23
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2014-15
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.