← New Search ↗ Social Card

Griffin Joy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 28 4 5 9 0.321 0.0420 0.0424 0.1091 0.1101
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 18 3 0 3 0.167
2024-25 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 18 3 0 3 0.167
2023-24 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 18 3 0 3 0.167
2022-23 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 18 3 0 3 0.167
2021-22 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 18 3 0 3 0.167
2020-21 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 18 3 0 3 0.167

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45615
Forward overall
#2961
Forward born in 2003
#4587
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2015-16
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.