IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Curry White Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-11-07 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits EHLP 31 7 17 24 0.774 0.0888 0.0872 0.1745 0.1713
2016-17 — EHL 39 4 5 9 0.231 0.0533 0.0523 0.1129 0.1107
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Curry D1 CNE SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Curry D3 CNE — 7 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Curry D3 CNE — 7 1 0 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2017-18 · Curry
+128.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15914
Defenseman overall
#2045
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Holtan
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Caleb Wolfgram
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.345 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Hall
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.