IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Genovese Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Elite 34 8 12 20 0.588 0.0543 0.0575 0.1347 0.1426
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 33 2 6 8 0.242 0.0317 0.0334 0.0823 0.0867
2023-24 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 52 2 2 4 0.077 0.0128 0.0126 0.0320 0.0316
2024-25 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#61214
Forward overall
#4430
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lukas Holmqvist
Plymouth State · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Frank Soscia
Fredonia · 2004-05
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Hines
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.130 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.