icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Brampton Capitals | OJHL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2004-05 | Brampton Capitals | OJHL | 44 | 1 | 15 | 16 | 0.364 | 0.1092 | 0.1049 | 0.2489 | 0.2390 |
| 2005-06 | Aurora Tigers | OJHL | 44 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.250 | 0.0751 | 0.0693 | 0.1711 | 0.1580 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Fredonia | D3 | — | SR | 25 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.280 |
| 2008-09 | Fredonia | D3 | — | JR | 23 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.130 |
| 2007-08 | Fredonia | D3 | — | SO | 25 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.120 |
| 2006-07 | Fredonia | D3 | — | FR | 22 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.091 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.