IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frank Soscia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-09-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Brampton Capitals OJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2004-05 Brampton Capitals OJHL 44 1 15 16 0.364 0.0891 0.0856 0.2503 0.2403
2005-06 Aurora Tigers OJHL 44 2 9 11 0.250 0.0613 0.0566 0.1721 0.1589
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 25 0 7 7 0.280
2008-09 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 23 0 3 3 0.130
2007-08 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 25 1 2 3 0.120
2006-07 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 22 0 2 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2006-07 · Fredonia
+41.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18932
Defenseman overall
#1526
Defenseman born in 1985
#3682
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aiden Moser
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Shuter
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinton Hill
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2021-22
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.