← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Burroughs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Owen Sound Attack OHL 53 8 11 19 0.358 0.2080 0.2080 0.9187 0.9187
2020-21 Owen Sound Attack OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Owen Sound Attack OHL 68 30 21 51 0.750 0.4352 0.4343 1.9219 1.9178
2022-23 Owen Sound Attack OHL 67 24 25 49 0.731 0.4244 0.4051 1.8740 1.7889
2023-24 Owen Sound Attack OHL 68 31 45 76 1.118 0.6485 0.5880 2.8638 2.5966
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 29 6 3 9 0.310
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2025-26 · Vermont
-35.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4913
Forward overall
#144
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.