IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Palmer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-24 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 43 12 17 29 0.674 0.0908 0.0893 0.2296 0.2257
2025-26 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 43 9 11 20 0.465 0.0626 0.0584 0.1583 0.1477
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Stonehill D2 — SR 0 255 2560 2815 0.000
2017-18 Stonehill D2 — JR 0 197 2037 2234 0.000
2016-17 Stonehill D2 — SO 0 130 1387 1517 0.000
2015-16 Stonehill D2 — FR 0 50 563 613 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40266
Forward overall
#2496
Forward born in 2005
#2108
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joey Sollazzo
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Isac Nordström
New England College · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Fryfogle
Canton · 2023-24
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.