← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landen Engles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 41 13 21 34 0.829 0.0765 0.0765 0.1899 0.1899
2021-22 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 43 10 22 32 0.744 0.0687 0.0686 0.1704 0.1702
2022-23 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 19 3 12 15 0.789 0.0729 0.0692 0.1808 0.1716
2023-24 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 42 5 13 18 0.429 0.0561 0.0531 0.1455 0.1376
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Cleary University ACHA_D1 27 4 10 14 0.518
2024-25 Cleary University ACHA_D1 27 4 10 14 0.518
2023-24 Cleary University ACHA_D1 27 4 10 14 0.518
2022-23 Cleary University ACHA_D1 27 4 10 14 0.518
2021-22 Cleary University ACHA_D1 27 4 10 14 0.518
2020-21 Cleary University ACHA_D1 27 4 10 14 0.518

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14863
Defenseman overall
#2796
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2013-14
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.