IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Maillet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Guelph Storm OHL 51 1 5 6 0.118 0.0682 0.0682 0.3014 0.3014
2020-21 Guelph Storm OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 — OHL 69 10 21 31 0.449 0.2607 0.2566 1.1513 1.1334
2022-23 Windsor Spitfires OHL 67 24 52 76 1.134 0.6582 0.6195 2.9066 2.7355
2023-24 Windsor Spitfires OHL 69 17 42 59 0.855 0.4962 0.4433 2.1912 1.9574
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara D1 AHA SO 37 8 14 22 0.595
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2025-26 · Niagara
+24.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5622
Forward overall
#178
Forward born in 2003
#376
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake McAlpine
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Sposit
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Clarke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.