← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Maillet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-13 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
St. Francis Xavier Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Guelph Storm OHL 51 1 5 6 0.118 0.0680 0.0680 0.3022 0.3022
2020-21 Guelph Storm OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 OHL 69 10 21 31 0.449 0.2599 0.2559 1.1545 1.1365
2022-23 Windsor Spitfires OHL 67 24 52 76 1.134 0.6562 0.6176 2.9146 2.7431
2023-24 Windsor Spitfires OHL 69 17 42 59 0.855 0.4947 0.4419 2.1972 1.9628
2024-25 St. Francis Xavier Univ. USports-M 30 10 17 27 0.900 0.4748 0.5076 2.6379 2.8203
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara D1 AHA SO 37 8 14 22 0.595
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2025-26 · Niagara
+44.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5110
Forward overall
#159
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.