IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Konyen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Sudbury Wolves OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Sudbury Wolves OHL 66 16 34 50 0.758 0.4383 0.4522 1.9467 2.0086
2022-23 Sudbury Wolves OHL 68 17 28 45 0.662 0.3829 0.3785 1.7005 1.6810
2023-24 Sudbury Wolves OHL 55 23 25 48 0.873 0.5049 0.4749 2.2424 2.1093
2024-25 Flint Firebirds OHL 52 14 18 32 0.615 0.3560 0.3165 1.5813 1.4058
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 AHA FR 35 12 12 24 0.686
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2025-26 · RIT
+110.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8756
Forward overall
#317
Forward born in 2004
#436
in OHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Ochterbeck
Curry · 2017-18
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lou Educate
Nichols · 2010-11
1.556 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Rudek
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.