← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phil Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-08-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 51 1 8 9 0.176 0.1041 0.1017 0.5301 0.5177
2005-06 Bozeman Ice Dogs NAHL 29 1 2 3 0.103 0.0380 0.0357
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 25 6 8 14 0.560
2013-14 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 24 7 8 15 0.625
2012-13 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 26 12 9 21 0.808
2011-12 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 24 4 10 14 0.583
2010-11 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SR 16 2 2 4 0.250
2009-10 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SR 24 2 8 10 0.417
2008-09 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 14 2 4 6 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2008-09 · St. Thomas
+631.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22437
Defenseman overall
#1672
Defenseman born in 1985
#4066
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2017-18
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2023-24
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.