← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Coughlan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-17 Country: Canada
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Guelph Storm OHL 36 4 2 6 0.167 0.0964 0.1058 0.4365 0.4791
2022-23 — OHL 40 10 2 12 0.300 0.1736 0.1830 0.7855 0.8282
2023-24 Sudbury Wolves OHL 61 10 12 22 0.361 0.2087 0.2101 0.9445 0.9506
2024-25 Sudbury Wolves OHL 65 24 19 43 0.661 0.3827 0.3654 1.7321 1.6540
2025-26 Sudbury Wolves OHL 59 18 15 33 0.559 0.3236 0.2927 1.4645 1.3248
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14842
Forward overall
#735
Forward born in 2005
#681
in OHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2013-14
0.38
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
WHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
NAHL 2015-16
0.10
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
WHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2003-04
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.