← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Coughlan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-17 Country: Canada
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Guelph Storm OHL 36 4 2 6 0.167 0.0964 0.1058 0.4283 0.4701
2022-23 OHL 40 10 2 12 0.300 0.1736 0.1830 0.7709 0.8128
2023-24 Sudbury Wolves OHL 61 10 12 22 0.361 0.2087 0.2101 0.9268 0.9328
2024-25 Sudbury Wolves OHL 65 24 19 43 0.661 0.3827 0.3654 1.6997 1.6230
2025-26 Sudbury Wolves OHL 59 18 15 33 0.559 0.3236 0.2927 1.4371 1.3000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14568
Forward overall
#727
Forward born in 2005
#653
in OHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2013-14
0.38
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
WHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
NAHL 2015-16
0.10
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
NAHL 2023-24
0.21
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2014-15
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.