IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Hazlett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-27 Country: USA
Southern Maine
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 — NCDC 37 4 7 11 0.297 0.1212 0.1192 0.2379 0.2339
2025-26 — NCDC 56 9 22 31 0.554 0.2257 0.2098 0.4430 0.4118
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
48%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19304
Forward overall
#1021
Forward born in 2005
#591
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Southern Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cole Klippenstein
0.52
actual FR PPG at Southern Maine
Tyler Mathieu
0.39
actual FR PPG at Southern Maine
Raphael Lajeunesse
0.29
actual FR PPG at Southern Maine
Elliot Van Orsdel
0.44
actual FR PPG at Southern Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Campbell
Marian · 2011-12
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Bernhardson
Concordia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Saler
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.