IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Pineo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-14 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Johnson & Wales
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Tilton NE-Prep 26 13 9 22 0.846 0.1676 0.1676 0.3855 0.3855
2024-25 Tilton NE-Prep 28 10 5 15 0.536 0.1061 0.1061 0.2441 0.2441
2025-26 Northern Cyclones NCDC 36 7 9 16 0.444 0.1812 0.1779 0.3572 0.3508
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24362
Forward overall
#1164
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Johnson & Wales Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cam Martin
0.35
actual FR PPG at Johnson & Wales
Connor Nelson
0.32
actual FR PPG at Johnson & Wales
Roman Wainwright
0.46
actual FR PPG at Johnson & Wales
Alan Boozer
0.33
actual FR PPG at Johnson & Wales

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Bertelsen
Elmira · 2022-23
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike DeGrazia
UMass Boston · 2007-08
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Besner
Bryn Athyn · 2015-16
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.