← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam McCue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-03 Country: Canada
2024 · Round 7, Pick #216  ·  Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Maple Leafs
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — NOJHL 9 3 2 5 0.556 0.0946 0.1072 0.2355 0.2668
2022-23 — OHL 33 0 1 1 0.030 0.0175 0.0187 0.0793 0.0848
2023-24 Owen Sound Attack OHL 68 23 14 37 0.544 0.3148 0.3215 1.4247 1.4550
2024-25 Owen Sound Attack OHL 55 36 19 55 1.000 0.5785 0.5610 2.6184 2.5390
2025-26 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 53 17 15 32 0.604 0.3493 0.3211 1.5810 1.4535
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8679
Forward overall
#341
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.67
actual FR PPG at Vermont
QMJHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Vermont
AJHL 2017-18
0.14
actual FR PPG at Vermont
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2001-02
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.