← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam McCue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-03 Country: Canada
2024 · Round 7, Pick #216  ·  Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Maple Leafs
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 NOJHL 9 3 2 5 0.556 0.0928 0.1051 0.2313 0.2620
2022-23 OHL 33 0 1 1 0.030 0.0175 0.0187 0.0779 0.0833
2023-24 Owen Sound Attack OHL 68 23 14 37 0.544 0.3148 0.3215 1.3981 1.4279
2024-25 Owen Sound Attack OHL 55 36 19 55 1.000 0.5785 0.5610 2.5695 2.4916
2025-26 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 53 17 15 32 0.604 0.3493 0.3211 1.5515 1.4264
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8535
Forward overall
#335
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2013-14
0.17
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
OJHL 2014-15
0.30
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
WHL 2024-25
0.16
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
USHL 2014-15
0.35
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2001-02
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2024-25
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.