← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braedyn Rogers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-11-21 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
RIT
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Owen Sound Attack OHL 43 0 1 1 0.023 0.0135 0.0152 0.0599 0.0674
2023-24 Owen Sound Attack OHL 65 2 8 10 0.154 0.0890 0.0959 0.3952 0.4260
2024-25 Owen Sound Attack OHL 68 7 21 28 0.412 0.2382 0.2445 1.0581 1.0860
2025-26 Owen Sound Attack OHL 66 6 19 25 0.379 0.2191 0.2139 0.9733 0.9500
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7087
Defenseman overall
#1484
Defenseman born in 2006
#1015
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

RIT Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2014-15
0.22
actual FR PPG at RIT
BCHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at RIT
BCHL 2017-18
0.12
actual FR PPG at RIT
BCHL 2018-19
0.17
actual FR PPG at RIT

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2006-07
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2018-19
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.